Home Tech Comparison Samsung Galaxy C7 vs Asus ZenFone 3 Review + Camera Comparison

Samsung Galaxy C7 vs Asus ZenFone 3 Review + Camera Comparison

8680
2
Samsung Galaxy C7 vs Asus Zenfone 3 Camera Review Comparison Price Specs Philippines Official SRP 8

The biggest comparison in Android mid-range race perhaps is between the new Samsung Galaxy C7 and Asus Zenfone 3 (ZE552KL). With Asus stepping into the premium line and Samsung beefing up its mid-ranger series, the Galaxy C7 and Zenfone 3 share a few features while separated by their prices. Without much talking, which is a more capable and better-looking Android Marshmallow smartphone? Let’s find out in our comparison and review.

Design and build

Both designs are step up from their previous generation. The Zenfone 3 went to all glass design with its curved front and back beveled by Gorilla Glass 3. The Galaxy C7 on the other hand features rounded metal form factor that resembles like to iPhone 6s and OnePlus 3.

Samsung Galaxy C7 vs Asus Zenfone 3 Camera Review Comparison Price Specs Philippines Official SRP 7

The ports on the Asus mid-ranger is one step ahead as it’s a reversible Type-C but unfortunately it still borrows the speed of a microUSB version 2.0 and not the 3.0.

Similar to Zenfone series, the Galaxy C7 and C5 have LED notification which was reserved to high-end Samsung devices at first.

Samsung Galaxy C7 vs Asus Zenfone 3 Camera Review Comparison Price Specs Philippines Official SRP 2

Both have hybrid microSD and dual SIM card trays and feature snappy fingerprint scanners. The one on Galaxy mid-ranger is embedded on the home button along with the backlit capacitive keys. We’d wish Asus had gone for a backlit navigational buttons as well. Nevertheless, each set is responsive and reliable.

In terms of actual size and handling, the Samsung phone remains slightly thinner yet heavy as the Asus phone while latter manages to keep a noticeable shorter form factor.

So which has a better design and build? For us, both are premium and solid. So it’s a tie here.

Display

With a 0.2-inch difference in screen size and the same 1080p resolution, sharpness level is as good as to the other. The panels only differ in color output and preferences. The Super AMOLED on Galaxy C7 produces popping colors and really bright output. For the Zenfone 3, the 5.5-inch IPS+ LCD packs more accurate color render and really good viewing angles.

We also notice that Asus went to a little vivid setup here despite the accuracy of LCD panels.

For display, it’s still a very close offering so we will call it a tie.

Camera

The main cameras on each shooter is a 16MP with Galaxy C7 having wider aperture and the Zenfone 3 with optical image stabilization.

Daylight shooting is a hit and miss on each camera, the Galaxy shooter still photos are bit saturated and with satisfactory dynamic range and noise control. The Asus shooter, on the other hand, shows more pleasing colors and mild control of dynamic range. The details are hard to differentiate here unlike on low light and extreme night scenarios showing the Zenfone shooter with better color reproduction, detail handling, and noise control.

For the selfie shooting, we prefer the most naturalistic shots of Zenfone 3 rather on the too pale and overexposed shots of Galaxy C7. Luckily, both feature extra control on selfie toning and beautification.

One advantage of the Zenfone camera in photography is the 4K video backed by 4-axis Optical Image Stabilization. We just don’t know yet if our Zenfone 3 unit has isolated flaring issues on bright scenes, but overall the video quality is pleasing as on the Galaxy C7’s saturated shot.

For the camera, it’s still a close call, but the small advantages on the Zenfone camera like the OIS and naturalistic selfie make the Zenfone 3 a slightly better shooter.

Performance, gaming, and benchmark

Powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 octa-core chipset and 4GB RAM, there’s really no competition here as each hardware could handle the most demanding tasks like playing intensive graphics games without stuttering. There’s a small speed difference in actual test and Antutu Benchmark, but no doubt, the two sets of hardware here are flagship class.

  • NBA 2K16 gaming up to highest graphics settings
  • Antutu benchmark 60k – 62k

Battery and charging

With extra juice, the 3300mAh battery capacity on the Galaxy C7 produces a few hours of lead time in endurance and screen on time. The 3000mAh juice of Zenfone 3 is enough for a full day use and still ranks average.

Charging time took less on the Galaxy C7 using its Fast Adaptive charger. It only took 1 hour 35 minutes compared to Asus Zenfone 3 at 1 hour and 45 minutes.

For battery longevity, the Galaxy C7 wins with a small lead.

Audio

The Zenfone 3 supports high-res 24bit audio while its mono speaker outputs a bit crisper and solid treble and bass than the Galaxy audio setup, respectively. For this round, the Zenfone audio setup wins.

Pricing and Verdict

Retailing at P17,000 to P18,995 price or roughly $400 USD, the Asus Zenfone 3 is just a few thousand cheaper to the Samsung Galaxy C7 with about P20k or $430 price for its 64GB model from online, which means its price will be more expensive once officially out in the market.

For a recap, design, performance, and display are close with the camera and audio leaning on the Asus mid-ranger and battery on the Samsung mid-ranger.

Picking the overall winner is a hard task, but we think the Asus Zenfone 3 is a better deal considering the Galaxy C7 is not out yet in the global market.

Still, let’s know your pick between the two in the comment section below.
https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js

Full Specs

Samsung Galaxy C7

Asus Zenfone 3 (ZE552KL)

Display 5.7-inch 1080p FHD display AMOLED, 386 ppi 5.5-inch Full HD 1080p LCD IPS+ (ZE552KL model), Gorilla Glass 3
Design Metal + Curved Glass Curved Gorilla Glass 3
Chipset Snapdragon 625 (2016 mid-range chip) Snapdragon 625 (2016 mid-range chip)
CPU Octa-core Cortex A53 @ 2.0GHz speed Octa-core Cortex A53 @ 2.0GHz speed
Chipset Adreno 506 graphics Adreno 506 graphics
Memory 4GB RAM, 32GB/64GB internal storage, hybrid microSD card slot 4GB RAM, 64GB internal storage, hybrid microSD card slot
Camera 16MP f1.9, dual tone LED flash, 1080p video 16MP f2.0, dual tone LED flash, 4K video, OIS (4-axis), laser focus
Selfie 8MP f1.9 8MP f2.0
Connectivity Dual SIM, 4G LTE, WiFi ac, Bluetooth 4.2, GPS, NFC Dual SIM, 4G LTE, WiFi ac, Bluetooth 4.2, GPS, NFC
Security Fingerprint scanner Fingerprint scanner
OS Android 6.0 Marshmallow, TouchWiz UI Android 6.0 Marshmallow, ZEN UI 3.0
Battery 3300mAh battery capacity, fast charging 3000mAh battery capacity
Ports and charging microUSB 2.0, USB OTG USB Type-C version 1.0, USB OTG
Audio Mono speaker, standard Mono speaker, 24-bit high-res
Release Date August 2016 availability in the Philippines August 2016 availability in the Philippines
Official price P19,990 SRP for 64GB model (US$430) in online stores P18,995 for 64GB model (US$400) in Asus PH / online stores

2 COMMENTS

  1. Come to think of it, if the C7 will be priced around 23 to 24k (tax and whatnots included), wouldn’t it be better to get the A9 Pro by just adding a few thousands?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.